#0416雅思作文分析# A类小作文表格，大作文 there are more new towns nowadays , it is more important to include public parks and sports facilities than shopping centers for individuals to spend their free time. To what extentdo you agree or disagree? 注意本题的审题的关键辩论焦点是：“到底是公园和体育设施还是商场（辩论双边）对于个人消磨时光方面，哪个更重要，或者说更有效。应该是大批同学都会偏题以及跑题，关于怎么跑的，以及为什么这么跑题，我们是很清楚的；

跑题分析：1， 没有强调和展开公园等公共场馆，或者购物中心。2，没有强调是对个人的，而不是对于当地经济，当地人民，政府税收，当地文化，体育素质等等方面。3，必须强调对于个人消磨时光方面的作用，而不是对于个人事业，健康，消费习惯，友谊，家庭幸福等诸多方面，都会视为跑题。小作文方面：季度末是流程图和地图高发，然后柱图和表格题目轮流出现静态图的，请下场考试同学继续关注和重视。

相关地道素材阅读分析：

Adding extensive parking to the Stanford Shopping Center for the purpose of High Speed Rail is an inefficient use of expensive land, which should be reserved for commercial or residential development. Extensive structures would also likely diminish visibility of the Shopping Center, which is highly critical to the viability of retail uses. The addition of such a structure would also have significant impacts on traffic in and around the Shopping Center. Palo Alto wishes to further development that is walkable and bicycle-friendly, and providing extensive parking facilities at the Shopping Center is contrary to those policies.

The total parking count of the Stanford Shopping Center is a function of the total retail space of the center.  The parking is also usually built by the owner, in this case, Stanford Shopping Center.  The addition of parking onto an existing structure can occur if the foundations were sized to accommodate additional loads.  If not, a replacement of the structure would be required.  Parking management tools can help to make parking available but protection of parking for retail would be vital for sustaining the center.

Not too much on the equipment side, it would likely require a custom machine.  Perhaps for accessories - tape, eyeblack etc...but even then, I think sales would be week.

Moreover, you'll have to contend with whomever already owns the contract for the park in question; most districts contract out to independent vending operators.

There are several public parks that are designated as an off-leash dog park in Austin, TX. One example is Red Bud Isle. It is a peninsula about 1/2 mile long, surrounded by water except for the parking lot that connects to a small road. There is one trail, a loop, that has several beaches and steps into the water in which the dogs can swim. There is also a large empty space for playing fetch and lots and lots of trees and smaller trails for all the dogs to play chase.  

in my opinion, there is ZERO justification for the use of any of the precious dwindling California potable water supply for lawn watering.
Irrigation is the the number 1 usage of public (non-agriculture, non-industrial, non-power generation) water usage. If it is illegal to offer a glass of water in a restaurant (will somebody please calculate the total savings of this trivial action?), then by comparative water usage, lawn watering is tremendously wasteful.

We are in an emergency, people! Running out of water will cause DEATH (due to the economic impact, rather than thirst or famine). Economic catastrophe for California will reduce the services available for the homeless, physically and mentally ill, public safety (police, fire), education, and more.

An acceptable compromise is the replacement of all "thirsty" (i.e., water inefficient) aesthetic and recreational landscaping, with drought tolerant (native and non-invasive imported) planting, reclaimed water (grey water), and non-potable salinated water; if these reduce each area usage by well over 50%.

（加李威廉老师私人微信：Liweilianlaoshi）